Popular Post

_

Friday, November 22, 2024

ChatGPT reviewed the paper "Detecting Past and Future Change Points in Performance Data"

 

Review of the Paper: Detecting Past and Future Change Points in Performance Data

Pros

  1. Comprehensive Introduction to SETDS: The paper provides a detailed explanation of the Statistical Exception and Trend Detection System (SETDS) methodology, which includes statistical filtering, pattern recognition, and IT-control charts. This thorough presentation ensures clarity in understanding the core concepts and their applications.

  2. Innovative Use of Exception Values (EVs): The introduction of EVs to measure anomalies quantitatively is a strength. The geometric and statistical interpretation of EVs as indicators of upward or downward trends is well-explained and intuitive.

  3. Real-World Application via Perfomalist: The practical implementation of SETDS through the Perfomalist tool demonstrates its usability. Its application to the MongoDB dataset showcases its capability to handle real-world performance data challenges effectively.

  4. Extensibility of the Methodology: The paper highlights potential enhancements to the Perfomalist API, such as predicting future change points and integrating critical thresholds, indicating forward-thinking and adaptability.

  5. Visualization and Examples: The inclusion of IT-control charts, 2D/3D models, and examples of API inputs and outputs enriches the explanation. It provides a tangible understanding of how the system operates.

  6. Focus on Performance Engineering Needs: By addressing anomaly detection, trend forecasting, and capacity management, the paper targets practical and high-priority IT challenges.


Cons

  1. Limited Comparative Analysis: Although the paper mentions combining SETDS with XGBoost and a voting classifier, it lacks a comprehensive comparison with other existing change point detection methodologies. This limits understanding of its relative advantages and trade-offs.

  2. Narrow Scope of Testing: The primary dataset used for evaluation is from MongoDB, which may not represent diverse real-world scenarios. Broader testing across varied datasets and industries could strengthen the claims.

  3. Technical Jargon: While thorough, the explanations are heavily technical and may pose a barrier to readers unfamiliar with statistical concepts or performance monitoring.

  4. Potential Over-reliance on Assumptions: The use of historical data to establish baselines assumes data stationarity and normality, which may not hold true in all dynamic environments.

  5. Limited Exploration of Future Change Point Detection: While the concept of future change point prediction is introduced, its practical implementation and effectiveness remain underexplored.

  6. API Accessibility Details: The paper lacks comprehensive information on API performance, scalability, and robustness in high-throughput environments, which are critical for enterprise adoption.


Conclusion

The paper presents a robust framework for detecting and forecasting change points in performance data using SETDS and the Perfomalist tool. Its strengths lie in methodological innovation and practical application. However, a deeper evaluation against competing methods, broader testing, and further elaboration on advanced features would enhance its impact and applicability.

"Detecting Past and Future Change Points in Performance Data" - another SETDS paper was accepted ICTDsC 2024 conference in India

The research paper was accepted for ORAL PRESENTATION at ICTDsC 2024 in India.

The abstract is below.

And the paper itself could be found as a preprint at our google drive HERE

Wednesday, March 20, 2024

My last role model - Prof. Igor Chelpanov

I just came across an article about him, posthumously, in his blessed memory - IN MEMORY OF IGOR BORISOVICH CHELPANOV (По русски

It’s interesting that I noticed in this block of mine that he is my last authority HERE, 3 months after his death, which I only found out about now (4 years after..).

He had the greatest talent - Teacher of PhD students. I found him myself after a presentation (about the dynamics of robot grasping devises) made by one of his students, S.N. Kolpashnikov.

This was a turning point in my career (he was my dissertation supervisor) and my entire professional life!

I am immensely grateful to Igor Borisovich and remember him forever!

Meeting of the Department of Automata. Polytech, St. Petersburg, ~1998
In the first row, 1st from left is I. Chelpanov, 2nd from right (I. Trubin)
Besides us: Popov, Krasnoslabodtsev, Dyachenko (head of the department), Volkov (future head of the department) and others
 

 I. B. Chelpanov